Raila Odinga Joins Ruto Government: A Case Of Political Co-optation?
Raila Odinga has ever, signed a significant agreement before the one with President William Ruto. In 2008, he signed the National Accord with former President Mwai Kibaki, which aimed to address the post-election violence that occurred in 2007 ¹. This agreement was a power-sharing deal that made Odinga the Prime Minister of Kenya, while Kibaki remained the President.
Uganda Today Edition:Raila Odinga Joins Ruto Government: A Case Of Political Co-optation?
By Uganda Today News Desk
Nairobi/Kampala – Veteran Kenyan opposition leader Raila Jaramogi Odinga’s recent decision to collaborate with President William Samoei Ruto’s government has sparked heated political debate across East Africa. The move draws strong parallels to Uganda’s Democratic Party (DP) President Norbert Mao’s agreement with President Yoweri Museveni—an arrangement now on shaky ground due to unfulfilled promises.
Raila Odinga’s Surprising Political Shift
For decades, Raila Odinga stood as Kenya’s foremost opposition figure, challenging successive governments and advocating for democratic reforms. His latest decision to work with Ruto—his fiercest political rival in the 2022 elections—has raised eyebrows. Many view this as a strategic maneuver by Ruto to neutralize dissent while securing Raila’s political capital for his administration.
Sources close to Odinga suggest that his move is based on a deal to influence governance, particularly in electoral reforms and national unity. However, critics argue that it marks the death of Kenya’s opposition, leaving Ruto with unchecked power.
Uganda’s Norbert Mao: A Deal Gone Sour?
In contrast, Uganda’s Norbert Mao, who signed a cooperation agreement with President Museveni in 2022, is now seeking to exit the arrangement, citing Museveni’s failure to honor key electoral reform commitments. The deal, which saw Mao appointed Minister of Justice and Constitutional Affairs, was intended to bring long-overdue political and electoral changes. However, nearly four years in, little has been achieved.
Mao has grown increasingly vocal about his frustrations, lamenting that the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM) has reneged on its promises. “We agreed on critical electoral reforms, yet none have been implemented. This was not just about personal appointments but about securing Uganda’s democratic future,” Mao recently stated.
The Parallels and Contrasts
Both Raila and Mao entered into agreements with sitting presidents under the premise of influencing governance from within. However, where Raila’s move appears to be a fresh opportunity for collaboration, Mao’s experience serves as a cautionary tale of political co-optation without real power.
While Raila’s supporters hope he can shape Kenya’s governance, skeptics warn that he could suffer the same fate as Mao—marginalized once his political usefulness wanes. Meanwhile, Mao’s struggles highlight the difficulties opposition figures face when engaging with entrenched regimes.
What Lies Ahead?
As Raila embarks on his new political journey, all eyes are on whether he can secure meaningful change or if he will face the same frustrations as Mao. In Uganda, the fallout from Mao’s deal raises broader concerns about the feasibility of political cooperation under regimes that resist meaningful reform.
The coming months will reveal whether Raila’s decision was a strategic masterstroke or a political miscalculation, and whether Mao’s experience serves as a warning for opposition leaders contemplating similar arrangements.
Published by Uganda Today, your trusted source for news and analysis
📍 Website: https://www.ugandatoday.co.ug/about-cmk
📍 Website: https://www.ugandatoday.co.ug
📱 WhatsApp: +256 702 239 337
🐦 X (formerly Twitter): @uganda43443 | @ugtodaynews
📧 Email: ugandatodayedition@gmail.com
Let’s help you grow your brand and keep your audience informed. Partner with Uganda Today—Reachout for a banner link on www.ugandatoday.co.ug
