Site icon Uganda Today

The National Coffee Bill 2024: A Brewing Storm and a Return to Historic Tensions

In 1960’s demonstrations about coffee management engulfed Buganda in the same way the current bill under debate in parliament is poised to stir, if we are to go by the unfortunate sectarian utterances by the Speaker against the Baganda and the stance taken by the Buganda parliamentary caucus since then.

Uganda Today Edition: The National Coffee Bill 2024: A Brewing Storm and a Return to Historic Tensions

The National Coffee Bill 2024 has stirred unprecedented debate across Uganda, raising concerns over government intentions regarding the coffee sector, particularly with the proposed dissolution of the Uganda Coffee Development Authority (UCDA). This proposal, set to centralize control under the Ministry of Agriculture, has become the focal point of controversy, echoing historical tensions around coffee management that stretch back to the 1960s.

The bill is rooted in a government-led rationalization strategy aimed at streamlining various authorities to consolidate efforts and reduce redundancy in public administration. Among these is the UCDA, an institution established to regulate and support the country’s coffee industry, which has grown into one of Uganda’s principal export sectors. However, the government’s move to bring the UCDA’s functions under the Ministry of Agriculture has been perceived by many as a means of asserting greater control over the lucrative coffee trade, leaving coffee farmers and industry stakeholders worried about the potential loss of independence in managing their core crop.

Benedict Kiwanuka, being congratulated for leading successful demonstrations that ensured that farmers controlled the growing, processing and exporting coffee in 1960’s

This government intervention has revived memories of the 1960s, a time when the coffee sector was under threat from political interference. Back then, under the leadership of Benedict Kiwanuka, the Baganda community organized massive demonstrations against a similar attempt by Milton Obote’s government to centralize control of the coffee trade. At that time, coffee was not just an economic asset but a source of pride and a symbol of autonomy for the Buganda region. The heavy-handed approach by the central government incited public outcry, with Baganda leaders expressing vehement dissatisfaction over what they saw as an encroachment on their livelihood and autonomy.

Adding fuel to the fire, recent sectarian remarks by the Speaker of Parliament during a heated parliamentary session have intensified the brewing discord. The Speaker’s comments, which targeted the Baganda community, have exacerbated feelings of marginalization among Baganda MPs and citizens, who see these utterances as a continuation of historical prejudices. This has led to a surge in criticism from lawmakers and the public alike, demanding accountability for what they describe as blatant sectarianism within the nation’s highest legislative body.

As the controversy around the National Coffee Bill 2024 continues, Ugandans are closely watching how the government handles this delicate matter. For more in-depth analysis on the historical and sectarian undertones shaping this debate, readers can explore previous articles at Uganda Today:

The National Coffee Bill 2024 has undeniably reignited a passionate discourse on the nation’s control over its resources, reminding Ugandans of the deep historical roots embedded within the coffee trade and the resilience of a community determined to protect its heritage.

Exit mobile version