Site icon Uganda Today

Environmental Racism and Ethnic Nepotism in Uganda: A Consequence of Apartheid-Style Governance

Generated image

Uganda Today EditionEnvironmental Racism and Ethnic Nepotism in Uganda: A Consequence of Apartheid-Style Governance.

Makerere University Retiree Prof. Oweyegha Afunaduula.Center for Critical Thinking and Alternative Analysis 11 May 2025

Global Context: Environmental Injustice as Structural Violence

A 2024 report by Amnesty International titled “Bhopal: 40 Years of Injustice” underscores how systemic and intergenerational environmental discrimination perpetuates impunity for state and corporate actors. The report connects global environmental injustices to structural racism. Uganda, too, is entangled in a complex web of environmental racism and ethnic nepotism—expressions of supremacist ideologies entrenched within governance, development, and socio-political life.

The thin line separating environmental racism from ethnic nepotism is drawn by ethnic supremacism: the belief in the inherent superiority of one group over others. Both are tools of exclusion, marginalisation, and domination—structural instruments in what I argue is Uganda’s growing apartheid-style governance system.

Understanding Environmental Racism in Uganda

Coined by American civil rights leader Dr. Benjamin F. Chavis Jr., “environmental racism” refers to the deliberate siting of hazardous and polluting facilities in marginalized, poor, or minority communities. Yet, when we consider the environment in its multidimensional essence—ecological-biological, socio-cultural, socio-economic, and temporal—then any form of sustained discrimination within these spheres constitutes environmental racism.

In Uganda, such discrimination is systemic. Development projects intended to uplift impoverished communities are underfunded, mismanaged, or hijacked by corruption. The poor are blamed for their own poverty, while political elites exploit environmental and financial resources unchecked. These conditions deepen what I have called “environmental poverty”—a trap almost impossible to escape despite official rhetoric about national development.

Examples are evident:

  • Communities near the Kiteezi landfill in Kampala continue to suffer the consequences of toxic exposure. Several deaths went unacknowledged after the site collapsed, and promises of compensation remain unfulfilled.

  • Regions affected by oil exploration face displacement, land grabs, and ecological degradation with little protection or legal recourse.

  • In schools, the divisive policy of preferential pay for science teachers over arts teachers—directed by President Museveni—has seeded deep resentment and inequality in Uganda’s education sector.

A 2021 Science Advances study confirms that minority groups globally—including Black, Latinx, and Asian populations—are disproportionately exposed to toxic emissions. Uganda mirrors this pattern, where environmental risk aligns disturbingly with class and ethnicity.

The Rise of Ethnic Nepotism and Its Governance Implications

Ethnic nepotism, closely tied to environmental racism, reinforces apartheid-style power structures. It occurs when one ethnic group dominates leadership, economic access, civic space, and resource control—while excluding or subjugating other groups.

In Uganda, a small group—largely of Tutsi extraction—has become synonymous with state power and privilege, enjoying easier access to land, quality education, health services, and international treatment options. Meanwhile, indigenous ethnic groups are left with under-resourced schools and hospitals, increasingly disenfranchised in public life.

This dominance is reinforced constitutionally through the recognition of an artificial group—“Banyarwanda”—whose political function parallels the white minority of apartheid-era South Africa. The Anti-Sectarianism Law, which ostensibly prohibits ethnic bias, is rendered ineffective when power itself is sectarian in nature.

President Museveni’s dismissal of lifestyle audits proposed by former IGG Beti Kamya—intended to fight corruption—illustrates this dynamic. His rationale, that the corrupt should not be discouraged from “investing” their loot in Uganda, not only normalised corruption but further empowered those closest to the state apparatus.

Ethnicisation and Politicisation: A Strategic Agenda

Uganda’s identity politics has been deeply ethnicised and politicised. Ethnic loyalty has shifted from private to public spheres, enabling state decisions to disproportionately benefit one group. Through intermarriage, land capture, education, and selective economic empowerment, this group entrenches its dominance and dilutes the indigenous character of Uganda’s plural society.

This is not just exclusion—it is conquest. And it is achieved through policy, coercion, and manipulation of identity. The resultant apartheid-like education and governance are widening socio-economic, cultural, and environmental gaps between rich and poor, insiders and outsiders.

Environmental Injustice as a Symptom of Political Capture

The link between environmental degradation and ethnic power is clearest in land evictions, natural resource exploitation, and climate change impacts. Droughts, floods, and displacement disproportionately affect the already marginalised, whose voices are often absent in national policy debates.

A growing coalition of scholars and civil society actors in Uganda—such as Afunaduula and Oweyegha-Afunaduula (2005), Kisubi (2024), and Mutesasira (2024)—has emphasized the urgent need for environmental and climate justice. Yet, without political will from those in power, these voices risk being silenced or ignored.

If exogenous power groups continue to capture Uganda’s land, resources, and institutions, the vision of justice—environmental or otherwise—will remain hollow.

Environmental Justice Demands Structural Change

Environmental justice is inseparable from racial and ethnic equity. As Frida Garza (2021) and Smith (2023) argue, these inequalities are not accidental—they are the legacy of systems that have allowed industries and states to pollute and exploit with impunity.

In Uganda, this means policy reform must go hand-in-hand with political reform. A genuine commitment to equity and justice is necessary if we are to build a sustainable, inclusive society.

Environmental equity cannot be achieved without racial and ethnic equity. As long as governance remains apartheid in character—segregating power, land, education, and resources—there will be no transformation worth celebrating.

Conclusion: The High Cost of Supremacist Governance

Uganda’s environmental crisis is not just ecological—it is political and moral. Environmental racism and ethnic nepotism feed off each other, undermining national unity, public trust, and the dream of social justice.

Unless these structural injustices are addressed, Uganda risks becoming ungovernable after the exit of President Yoweri Museveni. The legacy of conquest through governance must end—before it fractures the republic irreparably.

For God and My Country.

Published by www.ugandatoday.co.ug, your trusted source for news and analysis

Website: https://www.ugandatoday.co.ug/about-cmk

Website: https://www.ugandatoday.co.ug

WhatsApp: +256 702 239 337

X (formerly Twitter): @uganda43443 | @ugtodaynews

Email: ugandatodayedition@gmail.com

Let’s help you grow your brand and keep your audience informed. Partner with Uganda Today—where your story matters in shaping the social and economic dynamics of the country.

Exit mobile version